This article is written by a soldier, who
experienced the Vietnam War, and the words he used sometimes are rude. I think the
article is not a complete story and is combined with many separate stories,
such as the baby buffalo and six soldiers. In fact, I cannot fully understand
this story. I read this article twice and still get a little confused.
In
the article, the author emphasized that these unbelievable stories were all
true and was afraid that the reader would suspect him. However, through our
reading, it seemed that the author cannot believe what he saw or heard either. This
conflict inside him may be the thing that was given by the war. He acknowledged
the truth physically but refused to accept it mentally. Thus, we feel so strange
that why the author always says this is true, because he also wanted to
convince himself.
Sander’s
yo-yo is an important clue because it appears six times in the article and each
time will be followed by a story. Yo-yo always reminds the author with some
unforgettable memories. For instance, Sander rolled up his yo-yo before Lemon’s
death; Sander played his yo-yo before he was going to tell the story of six
soldiers, and etc. In some aspect, this yo-yo represents the war in author’s
mind. However, the confusing thing is that why author choose yo-yo as a clue?
Is that possible for a soldier to take a yo-yo with him in the war and always
have time to play it?
Another thing I want to mention is about the baby buffalo. The article
described process and the ending of Rat’s cruel shooting. Many people
surrounded Rat and witness his action, but no one stood out to stop him. The reason
why the acted like this is that they all get used to tyrannical behavior,
because that is war looks like -- a disaster. Soldiers are like this baby
buffalo, they are the victims of the war.
In
the beginning and at the end, the author mentioned the sister of Lemon. I
cannot understand why author wrote her. What’s the meaning of that woman? Is that
only shows how rude or change Rat has?
You are the only one to focus on the object of the yo-yo, but I think this is a very smart observation. The constant moving of the yo-yo could be symbolic, a refusal to be static, similar to the narrator's refusal to commit to absolute meaning. Very smart.
回复删除